SMT vs. Through-Hole Assembly: Tradeoffs for Your Project
In circuit board manufacturing, selecting an assembly method is integral to the success of any project. Aligning the assembly method with the project’s requirements is paramount, whether it's a simple or complex assembly. Our insights and expertise revolve around discerning and implementing the best approach to cater to any project.
This blog compares surface mount technology (SMT) and through-hole assembly methods and outlines their strengths and limitations. The method used for assembly depends on the board's design. Selecting an assembly method based on specific needs is important rather than simply choosing between two options.
This blog will explores the SMT vs. Through-Hole Assembly while aligning with RBB's core value of "Always Better" and our unwavering commitment to providing maximum customer benefits.
At RBB, we constantly assess our manufacturing processes and seek ways to enhance each task's efficiency.
Surface Mount Technology (SMT)
Surface mount technology (SMT) has become increasingly popular in circuit board assembly due to its ability to accommodate higher component density and smaller board sizes. SMT components are mounted directly onto the surface of the board, allowing for more compact designs and efficient board space use. This method also offers higher assembly speeds, making it suitable for high-volume production runs.
The advantages of SMT include the following:
- Higher component density
- Smaller board sizes
- Higher assembly speeds
- Efficient use of board space
The constraints of SMT encompass the following:
- Reliability concerns with smaller components
- Limited heat dissipation for high-power components
- Cost implications for initial setup and equipment
Through-Hole Assembly
On the other hand, through-hole assembly involves inserting component leads into pre-drilled holes on the circuit board and then soldering them in place on the opposite side of the board. This method has been a long-standing industry standard and continues to be preferred for specific applications where reliability and mechanical strength are paramount.
The benefits of Through-Hole Assembly encompass the following:
- Enhanced mechanical strength
- Improved heat dissipation for high-power components
- Reliable solder joints
Through-hole assembly is subject to the following limitations:
- Restricted feature density
- Larger board sizes
- Slower assembly speeds
- Increased manual labor
Selecting the Most Suitable Method
Component Density
If your project requires a high component density and smaller board sizes, SMT would be preferred. On the other hand, if space is not a constraint and you need to accommodate larger components, through-hole assembly might be more appropriate.
Assembly Speed
SMT offers clear advantages for projects with high-volume production runs and a need for faster assembly speeds. However, if your project involves smaller production runs and can accommodate slower assembly speeds, through-hole assembly might be a viable option.
Reliability
If your project demands the utmost reliability and mechanical strength, particularly for components subjected to mechanical stress, through-hole assembly could be the better choice. However, SMT might be more suitable if you focus on maximizing component density and minimizing board space.
Cost
Consider the initial setup costs, equipment requirements, and labor costs associated with each assembly method to ensure it aligns with your project budget. For projects with limited budgets, SMT assembly offers several cost-effective advantages. SMT components are generally smaller and lighter, resulting in reduced material costs.
Additionally, SMT assembly requires fewer drilling and plating operations on the PCB, contributing to lower manufacturing costs. The automated nature of SMT assembly also reduces labor expenses, further enhancing its cost-efficiency for budget-constrained projects.
On the other hand, while requiring larger and more expensive components, through-hole assembly may be suitable for projects with more substantial budgets. Due to the need for drilling and component insertion, through-hole technology often necessitates more manual labor and is associated with higher initial setup costs.
However, it offers robust mechanical connections and higher heat tolerance, making it ideal for applications with paramount durability and reliability, justifying the initial investment.
Product Availability
Consider the availability of components and assemblies for your chosen assembly method. Some components may only be available in through-hole or SMT versions, which could impact your decision.
Regulatory Compliance
Ensure that your chosen assembly method aligns with your industry's relevant regulatory requirements. Factors such as RoHS compliance and other industry standards should be considered.
Backward Compatibility
If your project requires integration with older technology, evaluate whether your chosen assembly method is compatible with existing or legacy components and equipment.
For instance, traditional soldering techniques may be more compatible with older components and equipment due to their widespread historical use. However, if the project demands flexibility and more accessible rework capabilities, surface mount technology (SMT) could be a more suitable option despite potential compatibility challenges with legacy systems.
Signal Interference on the Board
Assess the potential for signal interference and crosstalk between components based on the chosen assembly method. This is particularly critical for high-frequency or sensitive applications.
Techniques such as surface mount technology (SMT) and controlled impedance routing may be preferred due to their ability to mitigate signal interference.
Board Thickness, Substrate, and Finish
In comparing SMT & Through Hole assembly methods, it is crucial to note that the design dictates the assembly method. The chosen assembly method significantly impacts board thickness, substrate material, and surface finish.
The project requirements, such as board thickness or specific substrate material, should drive the selection of the assembly method. Reflow soldering, for example, may require specific substrate materials and surface finishes to ensure proper adhesion and functionality. Therefore, it is important to consider the design needs when selecting the assembly method.
Comprehensive Electronic Assembly Services Overview
RBB constantly strives to improve to best serve our client's needs. Our electronic assembly services are designed just for this and include assembly to IPC-610 II standards, surface mount and thru-hole elements in any combination, and expertise in ball grid arrays, micro BGAs, and 0201 placements.
We also provide optional services to enhance our electronic assembly services, such as assembly to IPC-610 Class III standards, equipment programming for surface mount, and certified testing, including UL, for electronic board assembly.
Our Certifications for Quality Assurance in Electronic Assembly
At RBB, we are proud to be certified to ISO 9001:2015 for quality electronics assembly services and a UL-certified control panel shop for reliable electronic board assembly, ensuring the highest standards of quality and reliability in our assembly processes.
RBB strives to move heaven and earth to get our clients what they need when they need it. It is our mission statement but lived out in our daily behavior. Check out feedback from RBB’s clients here to learn more.
Conclusion
When deciding between SMT and through-hole assembly methods, or a combination, it's important to remember that the assembly method is determined by the board's design. Designing the board based on specific project needs is crucial, rather than simply choosing one assembly method. The design always dictates the assembly process.
However, navigating these choices can be complex, and that's where RBB can help. RBB's experienced electronic assembly specialists can provide guidance in aligning the design with the project's unique requirements, considering factors such as component density, assembly speed, reliability, and cost. With RBB's assistance, you can make informed decisions that meet your project's specific needs.
.
